Faith & Freedom - Inutero Infanticide - Roe v. Wade Terminated - Part IV
Posted by David Alan Carmichael at 10/23/2008 7:46 PM 
Categories: Religion, Government and Politics, News and Media, Freedom
Categories: Religion, Government and Politics, News and Media, Freedom
Download | Duration: 00:10:45
Part IV - Inutero Infanticide Proponents Are Genetically Degenerate! Hence, They Are Bent Toward Self-Destruction. The Obviously Genetically Superior Infanticide Protestants Naturally Demonstrate A Propensity For The Advancement of Their Species!
Hey Dave,
I like your message here - its time for people to stand up and speak out against this evil in our society.
Reply to this
About Abortion:
Abortion is not legal because a woman should have the right to choose what to do with her baby. It is not legal so that the expecting mother can get a college education. The issue has nothing to do with when life actually begins, or the safety and well-being of the mother.
Abortion is a population issue alone. In the eyes of some, the earth has too many people already, and will grow to earth-harming levels in the near future if numbers are not reduced.
It is illegal to eat a White Winged Duck eggs. Even though 'they' would not consider the embryo alive until ? hatching?? The reason eating White Winged Duck eggs is illegal is because they have the potential to become White Winged Ducks. Why not use the same logic for Human Embryos?? The difference is because there are not many White Winged Ducks, and apparently there are too many of us. What other conclusion can one come to???
Reply to this
Justice Ginsberg recently made comments that indicated that she believed the Roe v. Wade decision was on the basis of the Court's view that population reduction was the political motivation behind the ruling. She has recently come to the conclusion that population reduction was not the motive of the Court. See her comments here, quoted from http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/07/09/ginsburg-and-population-control/:
But it was Justice Ginsburg's comment on another bullet point on the feminist movement's CV that had me reading, then re-reading and then re-reading again. In 1973, one year after her tenure at Columbia began, the Supreme Court ruled on Roe v. Wade, the landmark decision that legalized abortion. And Ginsburg had this to say about her feelings "at the time":
"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."
Whaaa? Having the faintest of inklings that Justice Ginsburg was not advocating the "one child policy," I had to read that entire paragraph at least three times. To be clear, Ginsburg is a supporter of reproductive choice and says in the interview "that the government has no business making that choice for a woman."
But in her answer to a question about Harris v. McRae, the 1980 Supreme Court decision that "forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions," Ginsburg basically admits that she once thought Roe v. Wade would be used as a form of population control. Therefore she was "surprised" by the court's decision, since obviously most women using Medicaid are poor and, well, that's obviously a population "that we don't want to have too many of." And to be fair, Ginsburg concludes her answer by saying "I realized that my perception of (Roe v. Wade) had been altogether wrong." (Emphasis added)
Back to my comments:
Isn't that interesting that a well education Jewish woman would think that there might be a final solution to the problem of too many poor people in America.
Population reduction, infanticide and euthanasia as particular means, was certainly the motivation by those arguing the so called rights of a woman to kill her baby. They couched it in the terms of mere medical procedure of terminating the pregnancy. Delivering the live baby is the appropriate mechanism for "terminating" a pregnancy. The Court majority was no doubt depraved, corrupt, vicious and degenerate. They did not understand justice. They embraced the Satanic modus operandi of 'Steal, kill, and destroy.' They bought the lie that was conveyed to them by their father the Devil. He has been a liar from the beginning.
My analysis of the Roe v. Wade decision is on target though it can be more thoroughly analyzed. I had to keep my comments succint so I could make a good impact on the listener without completely overwhelming the modern American media-blitzed listener who is not used to substantive idealist rhetoric.
Reply to this